One of the knottiest issues that coaches face as they start to work in this rapidly developing field is that of the difference between coaching and therapy. All coaches are taught in their training that ‘coaching is not therapy’ and we must be careful not to stray into this hazy territory. Because the quantum skills process can help clients resolve deeply embedded issues which have caused much emotional pain in their lives it is question that I have thought about extensively and examine in some detail in my book and DVD. This blog is an excerpt from Quantum Skills for Coaches setting out the argument that I finally accepted with the help of several past clients when I shared my concerns with them. In my next blog I offer a couple of additional thoughts on this tricky subject.
In order to explore the implications of the connection between coaching and therapy let’s start with the two questions: ‘what is therapy?’ and ‘can something be therapeutic without being ‘therapy?’ First though we will clarify what we understand coaching to be and what it is not.
Coaching, as we know, is about helping clients to find their own solutions. This is done firstly through deep-veined listening where the coach is able to listen, not only to the words the client utters, but also to the way they are uttered. This enables the coach to pick up on ‘the music behind the words’ and tune into realities that the client may be describing but is perhaps not consciously aware of and which may provide clues with which the coach can work. The other key skill in coaching is the use of powerful and incisive questions, which help clients see their life situations in new ways and cut through their limiting assumptions about ‘the way things are.’
An essential component of successful coaching is that coaches adopts a ‘coaching mind-set’ which means firstly that they have no attachment to their own agenda and secondly that they see everything the clients says merely as information to work with, with no judgment as to whether it is good or bad, desirable or not.
This, I think you will agree is a fairly simple overview of the essence of coaching. As coaches we have also been well-drilled in an understanding of what coaching is not through our training programmes and the books we have studied – it is not advising, counselling or therapy. All the input comes from the client and not from us. We might offer feedback as to what we observe in the client’s behaviour, body language or responses but this really is the limit of our input.
I believe that most coaches, at some time or another disregard this when we feel it to be appropriate. For instance, if the client is totally disorganised it would be a bit of a struggle to coach them into designing an effective time management tool from scratch. We clearly want to hear their thoughts about the way they manage their time and what being organised might look like to them, but with scores of books on time management to draw from it generally feels acceptable to give them a heads-up on one of the many effective and proven techniques available, or at least some ‘hot hints and tips’ on being more organised. Similarly when coaching a client through managing stress – how many coaches would think twice about teaching a deep breathing exercise?
And then as we explore the issues that are causing the stress, what happens if we discover that the client is experiencing some deep emotional pain? Do we back off at that point and refer the client to a therapist or do we explore further with the client? What if our further explorations reveal that the client is terrified of creating authentic relationships with others? Do we then cease the coaching programme? If we continue and find that this fear is rooted in a dysfunctional childhood does that ring the warning bells for us?
You may have found yourself trying to answer any of these questions at some point in your coaching experiences and come up with different answers at differing times depending on the client and your feeling of confidence at that moment. The truth is that we’re making judgements about these things all the time and using our intuition to decide what to do. People are holistic beings and every part of their life is connected to every other part.
You may be coaching a senior executive to develop leadership skills to improve team’s performance and in the process uncover feeling of inferiority around others caused by a dominant father. The executive’s workplace issues are securely linked to this and to try to deal with their leadership skills without addressing the impact of the parent’s behaviour is to apply a sticking plaster to an infected wound without first cleansing it. “What if I open a Pandora’s Box?” you may ask yourself. What if you don’t? The client will always be at risk from the lid popping open at some other time and releasing the emotions that have been suppressed for so long. An advertisement on a passing bus, a film or television programme or a throwaway comment overheard in the company cafeteria can release the fragile catch on the box. The question is how to do it in a way that is safe and leads to permanent change?
Therapy or not?
The key word is ‘therapy’ – we know that we are not supposed to cross the line between coaching and therapy. What is therapy then? So let’s look at the dictionary definition.
1. a treatment of physical, mental, or behavioural problems that is meant to cure or rehabilitate somebody
2. psychoanalysis or techniques from another school of psychotherapy, intended to treat mental and emotional problems with psychological methods
The second definition points towards the work of a professionally qualified psychotherapist. In the first definition the words ‘treatment’ and ‘cure’ might be significant here so let’s look those up too.
treatment
1. the application of medical care to cure disease, heal injuries, or ease symptoms
2. a particular remedy, procedure, or technique for curing or alleviating a disease, injury, or condition
cure
1. to restore a sick person or animal to health
2. to bring about recovery from an illness, disorder, or injury
and while we’ve got the dictionary out - ‘to recover’ is:
1. to return to a previous state of health, prosperity, or equanimity
2. to bring the self back to a normal condition
Whilst all of these definitions refer primarily to professional medical intervention they all also point to a more general restoration of normal functioning. Therapy could be described as ‘applying a technique or set of tools’. Earlier in this blog I proffered the question “can something be therapeutic without being ‘therapy’?” An overview of the above definitions shows that therapy can be seen as applying a technique to alleviate a condition and bring the self back to a normal condition or to return someone to a previous state of health or equanimity. Therefore, an activity that achieves this outcome could be seen to be therapeutic. We all know that when we’re feeling negative, stressed or even depressed a walk in the woods, a swim in the ocean, cleaning the house, baking a loaf of bread or planning a new project such as moving house all help to move us to a more positive place of equanimity and can be described as therapeutic. And of course we all know that retail therapy is aptly named! When we are troubled just talking to someone about the problem can feel like therapy. If I ask a room of coaches “do your clients ever give you the feedback that they have found a coaching session to be therapeutic?” almost all raise their hands.
Yes, but it is safe?
So, it is not totally outrageous to consider that coaching can be a therapeutic experience for our client. The question then is how appropriate and safe is it to venture into areas that we have been taught are off-limits for the coach – mood swings, depression, shyness, social anxiety, feeling “stressed out,” panic attacks,phobias, obsessions and compulsions, chronic anxiety, eating disorders, difficulty in maintaining relationships, inadequate coping skills, over-inhibition of feelings or expression. This list is very similar to a typical list of conditions that many forms of therapy might aim to treat.
My experience and that of colleagues who work with the quantum skills for coaches is that, while we would not advertise ourselves as coaches who work with clients in these areas, if such issues do emerge during a coaching programme, then the coach will carefully consider whether to continue. I tend to tell the client that “coaching doesnot usually cover this subject, but that having said that, I work with a process that uses the wisdom of the body to surface the ‘inner knowing’ housed in the body.” I share with the client further details about the quantum skills and the body-mind and a little about the specific techniques for focusing on our personal issues within our body.
I believe that when we deal with such problems in this way, we are far safer than if we attempt to work them out using our brain with its reasoning and logic.
Once I have had this conversation I leave it to the client to decide whether to consult a therapist specialising in the issue or continue to work with the quantum skills process. Because, by this time the client and I have a solid coaching relationship and the client trusts the way I work, all such clients have so far, chosen to explore their issue in our sessions. However I would be genuinely happy if they opted to talk to a therapist instead.
Many clients have also told me that the reason they feel so comfortable to examine their ‘hot buttons’ with me is that my utter confidence and conviction in the safety and naturalness of the process makes them feel safe with it – and if I were less certain then this would affect their decision to do so. I never guarantee results of course, but I do firmly believe that whatever comes out of the exploration will be helpful.
These are the thoughts about this topic that I express in my book which do not touch upon the next layer of this subject which is the connection between coaching and healing. So in the next blog I would like to offer a couple of thoughts on this.